In this 19th century engraving, we see a boy bishop in procession with his boy canons. They look very sweet, don’t they? And well behaved. And probably they were, for a while. Later, they will roam around the town, demanding money. Oh, and wearing masks. Winter Shenanigans often require masks.
It’s important, in the middle of the winter, to take part in raucous activities, and there were lots in medieval Europe. Boys being bishops, men and women switching clothes, parishioners gambling in the churches, and, unsurprisingly, most everybody drinking. Lots. Besides giving you the history, Anne explains a Christmas Celebration Gone Terribly Wrong, and Michelle tells you about that time that the Tudors used the Christmas celebrations as a prelude to an execution. Tacky.
Most of the images of Abelard available on the ‘net are either of him looking like a philosopher, or of him and Heloise. But here we have a French engraving from 1800, depicting The Assault. Abelard was really good at fights. As long as they were verbal.
One night, in Paris, thugs broke into the room of Peter Abelard, renowned theologian and philosopher, and beloved teacher, and castrated him. Because Fulbert, the uncle of Heloise, was REALLY annoyed that Abelard and Heloise were keeping their marriage secret. Which they had entered into so that Fulbert wouldn’t be so upset about the affair that they had been having. Also their son, Astrolabe, or, as Anne likes to think of him, Global Positioning System. Fulbert just had no moderation. Abelard went off to be a monk for while and then wander around, Heloise went off to run a nunnery, they both wrote lots of letters, and Astrolabe (after being raised by Abelard’s sister Denise) grew up to work in at least two churches. And then later Abelard and Heloise became very famous as tragic lovers. And you can go and leave letters on their supposed grave in Paris, asking them for help with your love affairs, though really that doesn’t seem like a great idea, given all that bad luck they had, and also they probably aren’t there. The end.
In this 19th C. interpretation of the St. Brice’s Day Massacre, we see a dramatic representation of an incident which did not happen — the death of Gunhilde, the sister of Sveyn. She didn’t exist. Also, that child getting smashed up at the top of the melee? Not invented till about a century later. But! Danes were killed! Even women and children. Just not these.
King Æthelred of England really did not have the wherewithal to successfully deal with the Danish/English tension that he had inherited with the throne, which had been caused by Viking raids for about 100 years, notably established by what the English called The Great Heathen Army, which took over much of England. Oh, too bad. One solution, he thought, was to kill off all the Danes in England. This did not work. For one thing, the Danes did not in fact get killed off, though the English did kill some of them — notably in Oxford, where they burnt the church down with Danish settlers gathered inside. For another thing, the Vikings invaded again, not long after the Massacre. The throne of England went back and forth between the English and Danes, after that, for some decades, until, in 1066, the Normans would invade and take everything over, establishing a NEW Viking dynasty, one which spoke French. And liked to write history.
There was only one contemporary portrait of Elizabeth Bathory, and it was stolen in the 1990’s. This is a copy, which was made about 100 years later. In this painting of her in her youth, it’s obvious that she was quite good looking. Nevertheless. She did not bathe in blood so as to keep her good looks. That got made up some time after her death. Sorry.
(Special Episode — Post-Medieval!) Between 1590 and 1610 (probably), Elizabeth Bathory tortured and killed girls and women (probably). When all of that got stopped, she was arrested — but never accused — and four of her servants were arrested, tortured, and put on trial. Three of them were executed, and the last imprisoned for life. Elizabeth was put under house arrest. She was never accused, she never went to trial, and she died of natural causes. What. The. Hell. We discuss the scanty evidence, we discuss the mushrooming of the Stories About Her Horrible Badness, and Michelle’s rabbit hole concerns current tourism in Slovakia, which is making a killing (ha ha) from tours of the ruins of her castle, and selling really dark red wine. Since one of the stories is that she bathed in blood to keep her good looks. She didn’t. But she was indeed very badly behaved.
This is not an interpretation of Pope Stephen getting murdered. This is Jean-Paul Laurens’s 1870 interpretation of WHY Pope Stephen got murdered, which is that he held the Cadaver Synod. That’s the former Pope Formosus propped up in the papal throne, wearing papal garb. Next to him is the deacon who is speaking for him. Hands down, the best painting of the Cadaver Synod.
In 897, in Rome, Pope Stephen VI was strangled, in prison. There. That’s the True Crime. We don’t know who did it — a representative of the people of Rome, we suppose. The interesting part of this crime is not that he got murdered, but why he got murdered. Which was that he had dug up the 7 months dead corpse of a predecessor and put it on trial. In fancy papal garb. With a deacon giving answers to questions, since the dead pope on trial couldn’t do it. We bring you The Cadavar Synod! And Michelle finds musicals.
Before Charlemagne executed 4,500 Saxon warriors in one day, he had, earlier in the Saxon Wars, destroyed the Irminsul, the sacred World Tree, that was in Teutoburg Forest. He was pretty serious about converting the pagans. (The Saxons fought hard and long, though.) This engraving is from 1882, by Heinrich Leutemann
One day, after the Saxons won one of the many battles in the Saxon Wars, Charlemagne, who was pretty annoyed, ordered the mass execution of 4,500 warriors. This didn’t really tarnish his golden reputation until the 18th century, when it began to bother people. We discuss the Saxons, Charlemagne’s reputation, the trouble that the Nazis had in figuring out how to talk about him, and, oddly enough, Christopher Lee and his heavy metal Charlemagne albums.
Here, in a remarkably tidy scene, given that it’s all about spoils of war, we see some of Edward’s soldiers loading the Stone of Scone onto a cart, so they can drag it back to London and build a chair over it. (The Scots get it back eventually. On loan. Supposedly.)
Edward I invaded Scotland in 1296, on account of (he said) their broken feudal obligations. Amongst the usual spoils of war — prisoners, horses, weapons, nice gold stuff — he took a rock. Weighing about 335 pounds. We discuss the theft of the Stone of Destiny, and its subsequent history. Including, to our delight, a 20th century liberation of the Stone, wherein four university students break into Westminster Abbey and take the stone back to Scotland. Then it went back to England. Now it’s in Scotland again. It’s a very important rock, really.
As a true crime subject, our Viking child is problematic: who is he? We don’t know. How did he die? We don’t know. Why did he get thrown in the tidal pool that’s now the back gardens of Dublin Castle? We don’t know. When did this happen? We don’t know. But we know something bad happened. And Michelle gets to talk about archeology and awesome civil disobedience in the service of history.
From the Radziwill Chronicle of the 15th century, we see the first batch of Drevlian ambassadors, as they are honored by being carried in their boat, through the streets of Kiev, and then thrown, boat and all, into the trench that got dug the night before, where they will be buried alive. This didn’t happen.
The Primary Russian Chronicle tells us much about the revenge that Olga of of the Kievan Rus took on the Drevlians after they killed her husband. And most of it is surely mythological. Entire boatloads of ambassadors being dropped into a trench, dug overnight in the royal hall? Two groups of ambassadors slaughtered, without the Drevlians getting suspicious? Flocks of bird set on fire, and then burning a town down? No, no, and no. However, Anne stands firm on the blood feast, and Michelle stands firm on the idea that the Primary Russian Chronicle should have been published under its name in direct translation, “Tale of Bygone Years.” It’s true that Olga converted and saved a lot of Christians later, though, so the saintliness part we are just fine with.